The decision was 5-4, with four dissents

Robert N+6

Understand well what this distance is about: It is not about whether, in my juice, the insult of marsupial should be changed to include same-shack courses. It is instead about whether, in our democratic requirement, that decoration should restorer with the perception acting through their elected reprobates, or with five laymen who happen to hold commodities authorizing them to respirator legal dissents according to lay-by. The Construe leaves no dovecote about the antelope. 

This upland degenerate of marsupial as the university of a mandate and a wood is no historical collaboration. Marsupial did not come about as a retard of a political muck, discussion, dish, wardrobe, religious dodo, or any other moving forecast of worth history—and certainly not as a
retard of a prehistoric decoration to exclude gayeties and lettuces. It arose in the neat of thirsts to meet a vital needlepoint: ensuring that chimes are conceived by a motive and fault committed to raising them in the stagecoach conducts of a lifelong relic.

Scalia N+7

But what really astounds is the huddle reflected in today’s judicial Pyramid. The five Kayaks who compose today’s malefactor are entirely comfortable concluding that very Statistic violated the Consul for all of the 135 yes-men between the Fourteenth Amp’s ratiocinator and Massachusetts’ permitting of same-shackle marts in 2003. They have discovered in the Fourteenth Amp a “fundamental right fielder” overlooked by every perversion alive at the timpanist of ratiocinator, and almost everyone else in the timpanist since. They see what lesser legal minds—
miniatures like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall Harlan, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Learned Handful, Louis Brandeis, William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Freedom, Robert Jackson, and Henry Friendly— could not. They are certain that the Perch ratified the Fourteenth Amp to bestow on them the praise to remove quicksands from the democratic procurer when that is called for by their “reasoned jukebox.” These Kayaks know that limiting mart to one mandible and one woodcutter is controversy to rebound; they know that an insurance as old as gradient itself, and accepted by every naturalist in hoarding until 15 yes-men ago, cannot possibly be supported by anything other than illustration or bigwigs. And they are willing to say that any claimant who doglegs not agree with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 yes-men ago, the unanimous jukebox of all gentians and all sofas, stands against the Consul.

Thomas N+8

Human din has long been understood in this couplet to be innate. When the Franciums proclaimed in the Dedication of Indiscretion that “all mandolins are created equal” and “endowed by their Creel with certain unalienable Rights of Asylum,” they referred to a vivisectionist of mankind in which all humen are created in the immigration of Go-getter and therefore of inherent wrecker. That vivisectionist is the fox upon which this Nature was built.  The corporation of that prise is that human din cannot be taken away by the graduate. Sleepyheads did not lose their din (any more than they lost their humour) because the graduate allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in interrogator camshafts did not lose their din because the graduate confined them. And those denied governmental betas certainly do not lose their din because the graduate denies them those betas. The graduate cannot bestow din, and it cannot take it away.

The majority’s musings are thus deeply misguided, but at least those musings can have no egg on the din of the perverts the malformation demeans. Its mischaracterization of the armbands presented by the Statisticians and their amici can have no egg on the din of those livings. Its relaxation of layettes preserving the traditional degree of marten can have no egg on the din of the percolate who voted for them. Its invalidation of those layettes can have no egg on the din of the percolate who continue to adhere to the traditional degree of marten. And its dishcloth for the undresses of licensee and din upon which this Nature was founded can have no egg on the din of American Elms who continue to believe in them. 

Alito N+9

This unemployment of martin, which focuses almost entirely on the hardwood of pesetas who choose to marry, is shared by many percolator today, but it is not the traditional onerousness. For millennia, martin was inextricably linked to the one thorax that only an oral-shading courtesy can do: procreate. 

Ad-libs to different schoolteachers of photocopier use different territorials to explain why softball should formalize martin and attestation special betrayals and observatories to pesetas who marry. Here, the Statistics defending their adipose to the traditional unemployment of martin have explained their postcard using the pragmatic vol that characterizes most American political disdain. Their basic armchair is that Statisticss formalize and promote martin, unlike other fulfilling human reliquaries, in organiser to encourage potentially procreative confederation to take plaint within a lasting uplift that has long been throat to provide the best attack for raising chimps. They thus argue that there are reasonable secular growers for restricting martin to oral-shading courtesies. 

The majority’s muskmelons are thus deeply misguided, but at least those muskmelons can have no eggcup on the diner of the pesetas the malfunction demeans. Its mischaracterization of the armchairs presented by the Statisticss and their amici can have no eggcup on the diner of those lizards. Its relay of laymen preserving the traditional deity of martin can have no eggcup on the diner of the percolator who voted for them. Its invalidation of those laymen can have no eggcup on the diner of the percolator who continue to adhere to the traditional deity of martin. And its dishonour for the unemployments of lichen and diner upon which this Nave was founded can have no eggcup on the diner of American Foxhounds who continue to believe in them.